| |
|
| 
|
Please
note, all reports are available in PDF format only.
To download a copy of Adobe Reader, please click
here.
Paper by James Hines of the University of Michigan titled "Do Tax Havens Flourish?", October 2004
"Remodelling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom" - an article in the American Political Science Review by Scott Basinger and Mark Hallerberg, May 2004
Rachel Griffith and Alexander Clemm of the Institute for Fiscal Studies report titled "What has been the Tax Competition Experience of the Last 20 Years?", February 2004
"The Benefits of Tax Competition" - a paper by Richard Teather of the Institute of Economic Affairs, 2005
Yesim Yilmaz paper for Prosperitas titled "Tax Havens, Tax Competition and Economic Performance", June 2006
Marshall Langer, writing in Tax Notes International on "The Outrageous History of Caribbean Tax Treaties with OECD Member States", June 2002
"Offshore Financial Centres: the Supranational Initiatives" - an article by Richard Hay
Louise Mitchell presentation to the Euromoney Annual Offshore Seminar titled "Reviewing the OECD Harmful Tax Initiative: the St. Vincent & the Grenadines Perspective", May 2005
Global Transparency, Exchange of Tax Information and Small Nations – Much Has Been Done, But More Needed to Ensure a Level Playing Field 26 May 2006
LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD Paper by the International Trade and Investment Organization OECD Global Tax Forum Melbourne, 15 - 16 November 2005
LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD Proposal by the International Trade and Investment Organization OECD Global Tax Forum, Ottawa, 14-15 October 2003
Closing statement by the Co-Chairs: OECD
Global Forum on Taxation, Ottawa, 14-15 October 2003
Levelling
the Playing Field: ITIO paper tabled at OECD
Global Forum on Taxation, 14-15 October 2003
Agenda
for OECD Global Forum on Taxation , 14-15 October
2003
Towards a Level Playing Field - Second Edition
ITIO
letter to OECD asking for commitment to level playing
field, 12 February 2002
The 17 fundamental clarifications sought from the
OECD on 28 February 2001
|
|
|
|
|